Well, I've heard worse about Spiderman 3. I had doubts from the beginning, knowing that there's Sandman, a Goblin (I can never keep Hobgoblin and Green Goblin straight), and the symbiont, which inevitably leads to a third villian--Venom.
Top that off with the wedding, and it became a situation of either 1) the movie will be 4 1/2 hours long, or 2) they won't be able to develop the different characters and plot lines well enough to make me care.
Then I hear from other people that the acting is as bad as ever (Toby is a little too good at playing the dorky kid, and I really can't make myself care about Mary Jane as played by Kirsten Dunst), and they got the main character from That 70's Show (Topher something?) to play Eddie Brock, who is supposed to be a big, buff, muscle-bound meathead... And I really can't see myself paying to even see that movie at the dollar theater.
Comments 3
It was this or Spiderman... And you almost made Spiderman seem like a better choice.
Reply
I haven't seen Spidey 3 yet, so I have no idea of its suckyness in comparison.
Reply
Top that off with the wedding, and it became a situation of either 1) the movie will be 4 1/2 hours long, or 2) they won't be able to develop the different characters and plot lines well enough to make me care.
Then I hear from other people that the acting is as bad as ever (Toby is a little too good at playing the dorky kid, and I really can't make myself care about Mary Jane as played by Kirsten Dunst), and they got the main character from That 70's Show (Topher something?) to play Eddie Brock, who is supposed to be a big, buff, muscle-bound meathead... And I really can't see myself paying to even see that movie at the dollar theater.
Reply
Leave a comment