(Untitled)

May 06, 2010 11:06

I have come to the conclusion that Australia has the right idea when it comes to elections, and we should copy them.  They have a system of compulsory voting.  Well,a better dscription would be, compulsory turn out.  Everyone able to vote must attend the polling station and have their name checked off the list there.  If they don't, and can't give ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 25

midnightschilde May 6 2010, 10:30:03 UTC
I plan to go get lost looking for the station pretty soon!

Reply


faerierhona May 6 2010, 10:34:23 UTC
I am glad every day I do not live in a country where my civil rights become civil compulsions - I don't see why I shouldn't have the right *not* to vote

Reply

slick_mink May 6 2010, 10:38:14 UTC
Then reread what I said. You are free to not vote once you have gone.

I just think any system that removes the sheer mind boggling numbers that don't even bother to head down to the polling station is a good one.

Reply

faerierhona May 6 2010, 10:44:53 UTC
It is still the government forcing me to go somewhere which is coercion to vote

I think any system which *educates* people into why voting matters is a good thing.

Reply

slick_mink May 6 2010, 10:51:25 UTC
It's not coercion to vote, it's coercion to turn out. While they are related, they are different.

It's become clear that education doesn't really work for encouraging people to vote. It's a crying fucking shame.

Reply


midnightschilde May 6 2010, 11:38:30 UTC
Do you think maybe theres more scope for looking at why people can't be bothered?

If it's because they feel they wont make a difference anyway, maybe it's time we changed the system so that everyones say counts for more?

Reply

slick_mink May 6 2010, 11:40:56 UTC
Honestly, I'd prefer a different system. I think the current one sucks a huge amount, since many people use the same excuse of "Well, I live in a safe seat so there is no point."

Reply

midnightschilde May 6 2010, 12:00:59 UTC
Hey, I live in a safe seat, but I'm still off to at least make sure the guy doesn't get 100% of the votes heh :)

Reply

belak_krin May 6 2010, 11:46:00 UTC
I think there tend to be two categories; those who have looked at all the options and feel their views are not represented/have some moral objection, and those who simply do not know/care enough to walk down to their local polling station.

The former case is a shame, but hey, thats a view too (though I personally think they should make that known by spoiling the ballot rather than not turning up - voter apathy doesn't affect the election). In the case of the latter, education is needed to point out how politics affects them but IMHO there will always be a large group who are too lazy to do it... giving them a reason to get involved (even if it is negative re-enforcement) could be the way forward.

Reply


seph_hazard May 6 2010, 12:11:06 UTC
I dunno. I suppose my position on this one is to grudgingly concede that it would be an infringement of civil liberties, while really really wishing that it wasn't and I could just promote it as an option anyway. I am severely inclined to agree with you, though, and the concession is very grudging.

Reply

mionassmaster May 6 2010, 17:11:54 UTC
If I lived in Australia I would be in jail now.

I wouldn't turn up and I wouldn't pay the fine.

I vote (or attend the polling station) because it is my right to do so.

I have voted today because I wanted to. Not out of force, not out of peer pressure and certainly not because some government agency is commanding me to me to.

Reply

seph_hazard May 6 2010, 17:18:29 UTC
Like I say, I do concede that it shouldn't actually be law :-)

Reply


idunnolog May 6 2010, 20:29:53 UTC
I have done my postal vote and so has your father. I was brought up to believe it was a Right and a Civic Duty to vote, I want to have a say in what happens to me and my family.

Reply

slick_mink May 6 2010, 20:32:06 UTC
Yeah, you kind of instilled that in me didn't you mum. ;-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up