(Untitled)

[cherrycherimoya]

Now, I know we all probably consider ourselves pretty knowledgeable about how contraceptives work, but get ready to get schooled:

Sex-Crazed Co-Eds Going Broke Buying Birth Control, Student Tells Pelosi Hearing Touting Freebie MandateThe article itself is hilarious and reads like an Onion piece (the author takes the yearly cost of oral

Comments

[bronnyelsp]

They have their fingers on something, that's for sure.

[auntiesiannan]

I dunno, if they knew where to put their fingers, they wouldn't be so snippity about other people's sex lives.

[evilcresyluna]

I'm always amazed that these guys have no idea how hormonal birth control works - like if you're using birth control every day that means you're having sex every day! Maybe even three times a day! Slutty sluts! As opposed to what actually occurs, you take the birth control pill or keep your nuvaring in place or whatever whether you're having sex three times a day or three times a year if you don't want to risk a pregnancy. I find it doubtful that these guys are all "have as many babies as possible" conservative religious guys, making it doubly baffling - what about married couples who only want a couple of children? Are they then thinking that they're paying for them to have sex through their insurance company or taxes that go to medicaid or whatever? Do they really only have sex when they're trying to procreate? Really? Sure.

Although another LOL on the "maybe I would support this if she offered to have sex with all men!" because whut? Really gives us some insight into their issue, that these women aren't having sex with THEM.

[eyelid]

The best is the author's sum-up:

2.If these co-eds really are this guy crazy, I should've gone to law school

because if women in law school are having sex, they are sluts. But if this author attends law school just to have sex with lots of women, he is totally not a slut at all.

He should have gone to law school; we teach logic there.

I also like the unconscious exposure of thought processes here:

Assuming it’s not a leap year, that’s 1,000 divided by 365 - or having sex 2.74 times a day, every day, for three straight years. And, I thought Georgetown was a Catholic university where women might be prone to shun casual, unmarried sex. * * * And, let's not forget about these deadbeat boyfriends (or random hook-ups?) who are having sex 2.74 times a day.

...because obvs. none of these people having sex could be married. (Like I was. In law school.)

My bet: author is married but having no sex. And very, very bitter about it.

[cherrycherimoya]

My bet: author is married but having no sex.

Can't imagine why; he seems like he would be a blast to fuck. His wife must be some kind of frigid bitch.

[eyelid]

too bad they got rid of those husband-cannot-be-convicted-of-raping-wife laws. It's totally unfair, she's not doing her wifely duties. It must be that he's such a Nice Guy, and women always go for the Bad Boys.

[ljtaylor]

This argument pisses me off no end. Who do these idiots think these "liberal whores" are having sex with for which they require contraception? Other women?

also seconding everything "lj user="evilcresyluna"> said... +1

[cherrycherimoya]

Yes! They have contracepting sex with other women, then go have abortions!

Logic!

[nikoel]

Wow, the misogyny in this one is just so stunning I had to share:

I have been told to not sit close to either this bimbo or Pelosi. Because.... if someone slapped them on the back of their head, their legs would fly apart so fast you could get hurt. Or, at least they would damage your chair.