King Kong = LOSE

[snickersnack]

In my opinion, the $200,000,000 used for production and the countless $8.00s spent all over the world for that three-hour borefest could have been used for sustainable development projects, medical missions, research grants, etc

Comments

[miaowow]

i'm a sfx and hardcore action movie fan so this movie was A+++ for me.

but i agree with naomi watts. she's like an ugly duckling version of nicole kidman who even had to have one of her only cool parts in the movie (juggling) digitally done. (i'm almost sure.)

[lantern_waste]

i constantly got distracted by Naomi Watt's bunny teeth

i liked king kong

[aearth]

yeah. i guess with all the work i've been doing, a senseless, plotless 3-hour bashfest was what i needed (t-rex fight scene - hwaw!) .

but i totally hated jack black in the movie (even in school of rock) - when kingkong was shot down by those tora-toras, i was praying that it would land on him. and that last line was just sooo horrible, it made everyone in the theatre go "wenk wenk". i guess i really have no love for rockstars / rockstar wannabes. then again, everyone in the movie was so irritating - from adrian brody to that ship hand who "wants to rescue ms. darrow" - arrrgh!

oddly so, this is the first naomi watts movie wherein i could tolerate her. i remember not bothering to finish the us version of the ring.. she was so annoying there...and yes crek, her buck teeth's just too distracting - haha :P

[onefilipino]

you being a biologist thus biased for nature themes in the movie =

+1,000 credibility on your rant :) hehe

[dearth]

Ugh.

GROSSS INVERTEBRATE SEQUENCE = -1,000,000!!!

[wordstodefine]

i believe you mean AWESOME invertebrate sequence = +1,000,000