Bamalam on the pani-sti? MY DAMI'S!!!

Mar 25, 2005 20:19


Mmmmm, so anyway... I've been chilling on the pani-sti and thinking... Why does anyone need a significant other?

- Physical Gratification? I'm sure you can find a workaround for this one... And if you’re not up for the constant "Palm-lovin" then find a willing party, who isn’t up for emotional attachment. Physical Gratification is reached without ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 21

ctudball March 26 2005, 04:48:39 UTC
Nobody needs a significant other. Period.

Reply

sombraro March 26 2005, 05:01:49 UTC
bamalam my dami... Agreed.

Reply

ctudball March 26 2005, 05:22:22 UTC
Having said this, it still doesn't mean it's not a valid choice. but it's most definitely not a necessity.

Reply

saffireblue March 26 2005, 05:24:15 UTC
While i agree completely no one needs another, it is nice.

as for Love i think the knack is giving enough freedom that there is no dependance.

but working out what you want from a relationship and seeking that and not settling for less and not automatically doing what society tells you is normal.

just my thoughts.

Reply


sae_ra March 26 2005, 05:12:21 UTC
mmmmmmm..... nah... I've got nothing... I think the only answer I can give is.... people just do

Reply

sombraro March 26 2005, 05:23:13 UTC
mmm, thats kinda the point. Poeple are raised and told that one day they're going to meet someone perfect for them. Because they're told this they search for it. People then find someone, who's not perfect, but settle for it, and end up miserable.

Why cant people be happy alone?

Reply

sae_ra March 26 2005, 05:34:37 UTC
some people are (happy alone), but then again idea of sharing things with a significant other is appealing to people. I blame it all on fairy tales.... they've set it up so that everyone looks for the "happily ever after" endings in their life when it clearly doesn't ever happen!

Reply


l_j_addiction March 26 2005, 11:15:59 UTC
What an uplifting and positive outlook you have.

Reply


daltsy March 26 2005, 13:18:38 UTC
People NEED company... that's biological, we are a social creature.
That people want a significant other fills a number of other needs... security, physical, psychological.

Love is not as you describe. Love in itself is the caring for of fellow man, particularly friends, especially a partner. For example, my friendship with you is a form of love, my relationship with Jo, though, is a deep love. Your description of love makes love sound selfish... ultimately love should be selfless.

My advice is that if you find yourself looking to have a relationship, leave sex out of the equation for a while. You might gain a bit of a different perspective.

Reply

camc March 26 2005, 15:30:44 UTC
No man is an island. This is true. Some are simply an isthmus...

Reply

daltsy March 26 2005, 15:32:00 UTC
LOL

Reply

m0rg0th March 26 2005, 17:49:30 UTC
Hmm, oral sex? Is a 69 a double isthmus?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up