The great newspaper experiment

[spaldawg]

Albert sent me some pictures of workplace practical jokes a few days ago, and though I think he sent them to me solely for entertainment purposes (as noted by his comment: “overkill, but hilarious!”), they ended up providing inspiration for my biggest and boldest workplace caper yet. Today is conveniently the birthday of that girl from work, so I

Comments

[floatingbuddha]

Its funny reading about the escalation of these pranks, it's like work so completely disinterests you that pranking has become your top outlet to funnel your creativity into. That being said, I am enjoying these more and more and I totally anticipate the next installment of Ryan's Prankin' Hour.

Here is my topping this suggestion: I think you need to start expanding your targets. It'll open up avenues for multiple-target pranks, escalation in heirarchy (co-workers -> managers -> whatever), and best of all greater opportunity to manipulate people's reactions. You misdirect your pranks so they appear to be coming from different people, or even play pranks off of two people who are rivals and see if you can incite a prank war amongst them. You could be sowing all-out discord in the workplace.

also protect this post IT IS VITAL SEARCHABLE INFORMATION DON'T GIVE AWAY YOUR NETWORK

[spaldawg]

I love the first paragraph of your response. You have given my pranking justification and your personal seal of approval. Excellent.

I started trying to cross prank people today at work. The end result? I still got pinned for the prank and got called a punk by the person I was trying to frame. That was actually very satisfying though because I was framing the other cute girl in my group and she called me a punk in a hilarious and cute way. Awesome.

Give away my network? What are you talking about?

[dwu]

Pics definitely needed.

Feel free to abuse http://mungbox.com/upload.php for your uploading needs!

[spaldawg]

ugh...

[spaldawg]

Will do chief!

[floatingbuddha]

i'm sure there should be gasoline somewhere in that formula