(Untitled)

Jul 14, 2007 17:55

YOU GUYS I just thought of something and everyone's answer is "um, I don't know" so I'm posting it here for general discussion.

a little DH theorizing/meta )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

kurla88 July 14 2007, 22:43:50 UTC
...Hmm. I never put that much thought into it, but now it's driving me crazy too. o.O

Reply


brianne July 14 2007, 23:26:48 UTC
Regarding consciousness: If you subscribe to bundle theory, making horcruxes is kind of pointless because you basically have to kill the entire world to kill Voldemort. If you subscribe to solipsism, you already knew this and I'm just reminding you.

< /cty 06 >

Reply


hermanthecat89 July 14 2007, 23:28:46 UTC
Yes!
that occurred to me right after I read HBP for the 2nd time. It never really seemed plausible that Harry would spend the whole book running about after 5 or 6 horcri. It would get a bit boring.

Reply


effetely July 15 2007, 00:11:35 UTC
I'm pretty certain that the locket hasn't been destroyed, because there are several hints that it's been floating around Grimmauld Place and Mundungus Fletcher probably got a hold of it.

But hmm. Most of the rest of this post hurts my head.

Reply

effetely July 15 2007, 00:12:10 UTC
Hurts my head in a "this whole horcrux thing is starting to confuse me" sort of way, I mean. Haha.

Reply


gwaihiril July 15 2007, 02:06:44 UTC
Ooh. Good point. Didn't think about that before (tried to avoid thinking about book 6, didn't like it much), but you're right. If killing Harry would have been the 6th Horcrux, then Voldemort didn't have time to create it. I'll have to think more about the 5th, but you have good logic. Hm...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up