1.) Really, one of these days I am just going to work with proteins I can buy in gigantic quantities for cheap from commercial suppliers. But not any time soon. Alas.
2.) Hope Solo - future consort of the royal House of Telcontar! :)
3.) Bought A Dance With Dragons the other day (along with Biopunk, a non-fiction book on DIY-bio). Given that
(
Read more... )
Comments 8
Reply
Sadly, GRRM has not been taking up too much of my time. Soon, though, I hope!
o O (Emilia Clarke is welcome to distract me, though.)
Reply
I hope you get more time to read soon. :)
Reply
Me too!
o O (Jennifer Morrison, too.)
Reply
Do you have any recommendations for good Sci-Fi books? I'm thinking after DANCE I'll try to read Dune again, and maybe try to tackle Ender's Game.
Reply
Well, my perpetual recommendation for seriously gritty sci-fi (that involves actual scientists and fairly plausible science) is Timescape by Greg Benford. If you're looking for something a bit lighter and more action-oriented, I'd give John Scalzi's Old Man's War a try. I don't read his blog routinely, so - given a comment I heard a while back - I haven't grown weary of his writing style beforehand.
It resides within space-oriented speculative fiction, really, more than sci-fi, but Lois McMaster Bujold's Vorkosigan series is a must-read. If you want something a bit more dark urban fantasy, I'd suggest Sergei Lukyanenko's Watch tetrology (less dense narrative style and takes place in mostly modern Eastern Europe) or China Mieville's Bas-Lag novels (definitely more to plow through, thoroughly fictional setting as far as I can tell so far).
Reply
Reply
Timescape was published in 1980 (or thereabouts), so the "future" is actually 1997 or thereabouts. It did win a Hugo (or Nebula, I can't remember), and - because I'm totally biased - a good chunk of the story involves science with which I'm familiar and was tickled pink to see used in a sci-fi novel.
Reply
Leave a comment