Expecto Patro--- WHA?!

[tanamin]

Hey, chrissawyer, have you seen this yet?

Dan Radcliff (More like "Dayum" Radcliff!) NSFW

Our little Harry's all grown up. And how!

Comments

[altivo]

Still looks kinda young and scrawny to me.

It's interesting that he would have been cast in that particular role, though, and even moreso that he would take it.

[singingnymph]

Time to trim. :)

hugs

[robertnorlando]

He has gone beyond the role of Harry Potter. The reviews are in and he is a BIG hit! I am happy for Mr Potter...I mean Mr Radcliff

[gabrielhorse]

Hmm... I always have wondered why so many read more into nudity than there really is. Hes just nekkid, big deal. I was never one to make the following equation: nudity + pose = sexual material. Why do so many people get so juvenile over a naked man? I honestly don't get it.

[panda_pooka]

That, of course, falls back to the underlying message in (at the very least) American culture that insists the naked body is naughty and if there's a naked body it must have something to that evil, terrible thing... *gasp*...sex! I'm constantly having to ask myself, 'what century is this again?'

Still, aside from the whole nudity = sex hang up, I wonder if good old 'Harry' shouldn't have waited until after the whole Potter series of flicks was done to try this. This can't be good for the teeny-popper fanbase or their probably shocked and horrified parents.

Witch-safe burnings

[gabrielhorse]

Well said. Puritan sex is... just sex! Hopefully, no "witches" were burned for this :P