Ah, Palmberg. No redeeming qualities. Would looooooooooove to put duct tape over his mouth and have my way with him. [no surprise there]. That sex scene wigs me out. I don't know whether to laugh or cry or throw up. Sigh. And that whole scene in the kitchen, where he almost takes his pants off? Much better with the sound off [same goes for the whole movie].
No redeeming qualities. Would looooooooooove to put duct tape over his mouth and have my way with him You find him hot then? Even if mute with duct taped on mouth - that's still a redeeming quality!? \n/
i am not planning on EVER seeing SS3. EVER. I get your point - without Palmberg, it might be, let's say, a little unbearable. Though there may be other interesting people in it, one never knows.
I find Palmberg WAY hot, but only because he's being played by Callum. He is the only remotely good looking guy in the whole movie. I suppose that can be counted as a redeeming quality [the only redeeming quality for the entire movie? y/y?]
I was on the SS3 set for three solid days. Other than the Hanson brothers [who were WAY WAY WAY funny off-camera, but not so much during actual filming] and a very frail Leslie Nielsen, there is no reason to see SS3. The Hansons and Leslie have both done way better work. The dialogue/storyline I saw was even worse than SS2. Sigh.
oh, what a tragically horrible movie! I am so impressed that you were able to write it up without hurting yourself!
Also, there's the fact (or rumor - I can't remember where the info came from. I hope someone else can), that due to Callum's decision to sign on to this movie, he was unable to be in Men With Brooms (Paul wanted him to play Peter Outerbridge's character, Lennox).
you were able to write it up without hurting yourself! Write is OK. Watch is - umh, something else (it would definitely have hurt my pride if someone came in and found me watching this)
As for the Men in Brooms thing, yes, I've seen this too. Will edit the trivia part to add it - maybe in-between, someone comes with a source? cause you know, we have to be documented people :)
Comments 58
( ... )
Reply
You find him hot then? Even if mute with duct taped on mouth - that's still a redeeming quality!? \n/
i am not planning on EVER seeing SS3. EVER.
I get your point - without Palmberg, it might be, let's say, a little unbearable. Though there may be other interesting people in it, one never knows.
Thanks for the (mute) Palmberg additions!
Reply
I was on the SS3 set for three solid days. Other than the Hanson brothers [who were WAY WAY WAY funny off-camera, but not so much during actual filming] and a very frail Leslie Nielsen, there is no reason to see SS3. The Hansons and Leslie have both done way better work. The dialogue/storyline I saw was even worse than SS2. Sigh.
Reply
http://callumvixen.livejournal.com/26305.html#cutid1
Reply
Also, there's the fact (or rumor - I can't remember where the info came from. I hope someone else can), that due to Callum's decision to sign on to this movie, he was unable to be in Men With Brooms (Paul wanted him to play Peter Outerbridge's character, Lennox).
Reply
Write is OK. Watch is - umh, something else (it would definitely have hurt my pride if someone came in and found me watching this)
As for the Men in Brooms thing, yes, I've seen this too. Will edit the trivia part to add it - maybe in-between, someone comes with a source? cause you know, we have to be documented people :)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
say, Tin Man, or Code Name: The Cleaner?
Reply
Lovely post for a *cough*crappy*cough* movie...
Reply
Lovely post for a *cough*crappy*cough* movie...
Thanks for the kind words, but you're not throwing up too, aren't you? *worries*
Reply
(just a head's up: lj's being screwy and telling me "Sorry, you're not permitted to see this poll.")
Reply
Thanks for the heads up. The combined evil forces of the polls and Slap Shot got me - see my ETA and next post. Try again, please?
Reply
Leave a comment