okey

Nov 04, 2005 18:40

so still quite perturbed w/ buchy, adn so just a few extra tid-bits: when polled the main reson why people voted for buch was MORAL resons! okey i really don't get that cuz buch is like poster-boy child of the century for all agianst my moral standards! anybody wanna fill me in on how he is moral or anything like that?!?!? cuz i don't get it! DUDE ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 9

toria4127 November 4 2004, 18:31:23 UTC
Conservatives darling. Anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage, anti- stem cell research, anti- enviromental, the whole deal. Not all people are as progressive as you my dear. And, just for ks and gs, out of our close friends Viesh, Ana, Up-Chuck, and Kirsten would all vote for Bush if given the chance. Yeah.

Reply

teengoddessv8 November 7 2004, 09:35:36 UTC
actually i'm quite progressive. My 2 whole reasons for Bush was: my financial status, its not fair to overtax the wealthy, they worked hard for the money (with the except of just a few)!!! and my future career, medicine. I know Kerry couldnt have done much with a conservative senate and congress, but still, free med welfare for all suckx ass. and if no one knew, they screwing up jobs for high-risk doctors in FL. like my dad. If your practice gets 3 lawsuits against you, your FL license is revoked. What sane doctor would vote for Kerry, knowing that?!? You'd just end up with a bunch of doctors that do shit here. For the record, I'm pro-choice, the gov't SHOULDN'T be allowed to tell a woman what she can do with her body. I'm not anti-gay marraige, but don't call it marraige, cuz its not. marraige is between a man and a woman. Its age old and you can't just re-define it. Give the gays and lesbians civil unions with all the benifits marraige licenses. That's fine with me. In fact, i'm all for that. I'm NOT anti- stem cell research, its ( ... )

Reply

tree_hugger10 November 7 2004, 17:22:41 UTC
god forbid that just some of they money that u currently has goes to educating and feeding and caring for people who are unable to reach the ability to house themselves, u would still have u would still be able to go to the collage of ur choice and live ur life with full benifits, just u might now have a mercedes insetad u might be saving the lives of others, and peronally i believe that med welfare is a brilliant idea, it wouldn't comleltly screw every doc viesh, look at canada for godsake, it works WOUNDERS with it, there are still docs and theya rn't inept, but woooha the underprivilaged are living! and they get med attention the madness!

sry if that too harsh- crazy day today...

Reply

greasylightning November 7 2004, 18:14:06 UTC
well, okay, like communism, ideally free medicare is a perfect system, but our economy couldn't handle it, too many industries depend upon the high revenue of medicine, and we all know social security's goin to pot, we're all gonna be friggin workin till we're in our seventies, which may or may not be a bad thing, but its not very heartening, so they both ignore it because they don't kwo how to fix it, and its our genereation thats gonna suffer because they ignore it, as it gets worse, truly I would have to say I hate Bush and Kerry equally, we need a real leader in government, all these damn scum bag politicians...

Reply


rockerchick5070 November 6 2004, 08:48:32 UTC
no offense but just cuz he doesnt have YOUR morals doesnt mean he doesnt have morals.

Reply

tree_hugger10 November 7 2004, 16:21:02 UTC
see and this is when u explain what morals he does have? i don't undertand, i WANT explaination, cuz i don't see any...

Reply

rockerchick5070 November 11 2004, 18:38:33 UTC
ok his morals are the basic judeo-christian morals, anti-homosexual marriage, anti-abortion, and anti-stem cell, pro-church, and pro-faith based programs. i know that u basicly hate all of those things but those are a set of morals and u cant say other wise.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up