One of the great things about my job is how much, on a good day, it resembles an episode of House. But, you know, with less blood and screaming because we have computers for patients.
The amusing thing is how often the principles in TV show medicine apply. Dr. House can tell us a few things it's good to remember: (
Everything you need to know about computer systems analysis you can learn from listening to the esteemed Dr. House )
Comments 7
Shows the difference from my job! I've seen way too many messes from people fixing hypothetical problems, then failing to unfix them when it turns out they weren't the real problem.
Reply
But I suspect that hypothetical fixes in your genre are more likely to corrupt data, etc, than hypothetical fixes in our genre...
Reply
Reply
But to elaborate on what harrock said; the only 100% (almost) reliable test is to try it, so if that's the easiest test why not do it first? (And, yeah, that's a lot better idea if the change is a volatile one that'll revert at the next reboot regardless unless the configuration is changed, or at least can be flipped back on the fly...)
Also, we often to get apply another Houseism to that: "If I'm right, he gets better; if I'm wrong, he's dead either way."
And yeah, it's certainly also true that a lot of the issues we run into are the result of complex solutions to simple non-problems ("Just to be safe, every time we write a row to the database, let's read it right back to make sure the update took!" WtF?)
Reply
Reply
"Some patients are suicidal, whether they know it or not". Everyone wants to live, but some of those who land in your hospital are there because they made bad decisions which they will repeat.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment