If my last entry seemed bleak, that's because I focused on the negative parts about the first few days, and I must say I'm disappointed I got no comments of sympathy. In actuality things have been going quite well.
Fast FriendsIn the two weeks that I have been here, I am happy to say that, I have made a surprising amount of friends. My flat mate
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Justin and I say Proof and A History of Violence, and contrary to your analysis, I must say, I thought Proof to be the more flawless of the two.. A History of Violence was good, but it seemed like it had no center, no point... like it was an exercise in film making. I did like it though... but only like. Proof was fucking fantastic... I highly recommend it... brilliant and illuminating, and very well acted.
That being said... miss you and love you and all that jazz!
Reply
Reply
Diana and I also saw A History Of Violence earlier this week, along with Proof; which I thought was a much better movie than AHOV. The problem I found with A History Of Violence is the problem that I find with most Cronenberg films. The acting was strong, if not fantastic; the scenery rich; the story interesting... but the way Cronenberg chose to play it all out felt ultimately unsatisfying. The characters felt slightly plastic to me, and I got no real sense of any of their motivations. Ultimately, the surreality of it seemed forced; like Cronenberg knew that he was slightly off his top game. Given a second chance... I would have waited to watch it on DVD.
Reply
Although, if you can't stomach violence, there are a few, short, realistically portrayed scenes of intense, but never gratuitous or glorified, thematically appropriate, violence. That was way too many descriptors for one sentence.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment