your facebook rankings have changed

Jun 05, 2008 13:18

I could be having a great day and Facebook will send me an email saying "it's not as great as you think."

+

Poll

Leave a comment

Comments 40

counterfeitfake June 5 2008, 20:44:39 UTC
facebook can bite my ass

Reply


potatohead June 5 2008, 20:52:27 UTC
sweet is such a slap in the face.

Reply

turnip June 5 2008, 20:58:12 UTC
Aaron and I discussed this the other day.

him: the girl I met at the party is so awesome, so perfect. she's like really sweet.
her: so she's not funny.
him: well... no. she's not.

him: I met this rad girl who's really funny!
her: so she's not sweet.
him: well... no. she's not.
her: good!
her: you kind of need someone who's sweet, though.

Reply

potatohead June 5 2008, 21:02:11 UTC
Someone once described me as sweet and I got really offended. Sweet is for girls who have no idea what's REALLY going on.

Reply

counterfeitfake June 5 2008, 21:09:24 UTC
What is really going on, potato head?

Reply


odradak June 5 2008, 20:58:38 UTC
Why no "I'll take whatever I can get" option?

Reply

turnip June 5 2008, 20:59:30 UTC
your answer surprised me.

Reply

odradak June 5 2008, 22:11:59 UTC
In the end, after they get tired of me for whatever reason, it comes down to which of the two cause less damage. In my experience, the cold women have brought more misery than the dim ones.

That's assuming I have a choice.

Reply

counterfeitfake June 5 2008, 21:10:09 UTC
i will take "desperate" over "sweet" OR "witty"

Reply


lame_carrot June 5 2008, 21:17:42 UTC
tact is for people who aren't witty enough to be sarcastic.

Reply

turnip June 5 2008, 21:47:32 UTC
yeah, perhaps -- I've known maybe one girl in my entire life who seemed genuinely, sincerely, AUTHENTICALLY sweet, sweet at BIRTH. That girl was irreproachably good.

otherwise, no. sweetness is just an adaptation like anything else. "please like me, here are some cookies."

on the other hand, witticism is an adaptation, too, but it's not as nauseating. Or as manipulative.

Reply

Patrick Bateman says... drunkasalways June 7 2008, 05:13:05 UTC
I'm sorry sweetheart, but I have to disagree with you there.

One, (sweetness/tact), seeks acceptance from a specific group or individual by offering kindness, possessions, or self services. The other, (witty/sarcastic), is an isolating self defense mechanism for scorned fat or ugly chicks.

But, one can be sweet but not tactful; witty and not sarcastic; witty and tactful; or any combination, you get the point. (I hope)

Reply

the woman you've been married to for two years sez: turnip June 7 2008, 14:32:44 UTC
ATTN HUSBAND, HI.
I am sarcastic, funny, and smart. I'm also attractive. I have female friends who are sarcastic, funny, smart and also attractive. They comprise a good percentage of my friends list.

many traits are defense mechanisms.
Just because sweetness can have the appearance of kindness or selflessness, doesn't mean it's not manipulative or compensatory.

Reply


trisloth June 5 2008, 21:38:32 UTC

I guess I should modify my answer to be "I find 'witty' to be incredibly endearing and somehow sweet".

Dumb-and-or-passive-aggressive-sweetness is for the birds.

Reply

turnip June 5 2008, 21:52:48 UTC
if the question was, "which is better - smart or kind?" I would choose "kind" hands down.

but witty vs. sweet is different. Mindless, indiscriminate sweetness is insulting!

Reply

drunkasalways June 7 2008, 18:35:55 UTC
You must have hated meeting my ENTIRE FAMILY. lol

Reply


Leave a comment

Up