There was a referendum in Crimea, but there was no choice
On March 16 a referendum was held in Crimea on the issue of changing the status of the Autonomous Republic, arranged by the puppet parliament of Crimea under the supervision of Russian military without decals of grade. In my previous post on the referendum scam I was mistaken when I suggested that the authorities of Crimea would be noble enough to give a choice to Crimeans with an option to leave the status quo, i.e. provide a variant to vote for the Constitution as of 21.01.1998, which is effective in Crimea . However, such variant was not available at the referendum, "Yes/No" answers were not available too. Here is a sample of bulletin.
Questions are the same as announced on the website of the Supreme Council of Crimea , written in three languages - Russian, Ukrainian and Tatar.
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
Please regard the following text in the bulletin:
In my previous article I have already explained that both variants, regarding which the referendum was held, lead to the change of the status of Crimea and transfer thereof to Putin’s caring hands.
1. If you have written something in your first square, you voted for direct transformation of Crimea into a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation, a corresponding bill for such scenario Gosduma of the RF has already registered on February 28.
Curiously, taking into account today’s illegal resolution of the puppet Crimea parliament as of March 17, 2014, declaring the independence and sovereignty of Crimea, Crimea may end up as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation while being a sovereign state. In other words, Putin does not take the responsibility for the wellbeing of the citizens, who reside on the territory of Crimea, but merely acquires with the alleged permission of local citizens the right to utilize the resources of the peninsula; the preparations for this outcome have started long before the referendum - state enterprise Chernomorneftegaz, which is engaged in oil and gas extraction from the Black Sea shelf, was captured , the property of Ukrainian military units is being stolen etc.
2. If you wrote something in the second square, you have voted for expansion of authorities of the puppet parliament of Crimea pursuant to the Constitution of 1992 ; with such rights the parliament of Crimea will be entitled to make similar decisions without any participation on your part in the future.
For example, this vote was counted - the voter expressed the desire to vest Aksenov with the power to adopt decisions on the destiny of the peninsula without confirmation from the Supreme Council of Ukraine.
Probably this vote was not counted because a dot from the exclamation mark got to the first square.
This voter has grasped the essence of the referendum and marked nothing in the squares.
In addition to lack of choice other totalitarian methods were used during the referendum. On the boxes with the bulletins the "right" vote was marked.
By the estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine even such single option referendum was held with fabrications.
The main instrument of fabrication in the opinion of the head of Crimean department of the Committee of voters of Ukraine Andrey Krysko was the simplified procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. The amount of people that were included into the lists in such fashion in some districts in his view was «abnormal».
Also the expert does not rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station.
«Also it is entirely possible that the citizens of Russia voted using their Russian passports for identification. Such information appeared in many sources. We consider that the vote took place with employing «ghost voters», because the lists are very old and were not actualized. On one of the voting stations a list as of 1999 was used », - stated Krysko.
He noted that among the observers there were no representatives of any organization, which could have at least a minimal credibility. Furthermore, according to Krysko, the only permitted exit-poll during the «referendum» in Crimea was held by an organization, which has ties to one of the deputies of Simferopol city council, which also raises doubts regarding the accuracy of the collected data.
Hitler gave more options to the people of Austria than Putin gave to Crimeans, at least in the wording of the questions: at the referendum on Anschluss with Germany , which was fabricated on April 10, 1938, one of the possible replies was "NEGATIVE".
I can’t understand why Ukrainian media report nothing about this - there was no choice, Russia and Crimean authorities turned into circus performance, and this advertisement is false.
More on this topic:
1. An opinion by the Crimean Tatarian: "We are expecting strong actions from Ukraine". (In Russian)
2 . Self-Defense of Sevastopol - they have something to hide (In Russian).
3 . Illegal annexation of Crimea and the referendum scam.
4 . Russia did not invade Ukraine (in Russian).
5 . Crimea.Ru.Ua. Army, aconomy, predictions, Mass media. March 03-04, 2014, (In Russian).
6 . Military Provocation of Russia in Crimea. The Fight for the South-Eastern Ukraine. 27.02.14 - 01.03.
Likes:
Questions are the same as announced on the website of the Supreme Council of Crimea , written in three languages - Russian, Ukrainian and Tatar.
1) Do you support merge of Crimea with Russia as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation?
2) Do you support the reenactment of the Republic of Crimea Constitution as of 1992 and the status of Crimea as a part of Ukraine?
Please regard the following text in the bulletin:
- Please mark in any manner within the square the variant you vote for.
- A bulletin, in which both variants remain unmarked or both variants are marked, shall be treated as invalid.
In my previous article I have already explained that both variants, regarding which the referendum was held, lead to the change of the status of Crimea and transfer thereof to Putin’s caring hands.
1. If you have written something in your first square, you voted for direct transformation of Crimea into a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation, a corresponding bill for such scenario Gosduma of the RF has already registered on February 28.
Curiously, taking into account today’s illegal resolution of the puppet Crimea parliament as of March 17, 2014, declaring the independence and sovereignty of Crimea, Crimea may end up as a subordinate entity of the Russian Federation while being a sovereign state. In other words, Putin does not take the responsibility for the wellbeing of the citizens, who reside on the territory of Crimea, but merely acquires with the alleged permission of local citizens the right to utilize the resources of the peninsula; the preparations for this outcome have started long before the referendum - state enterprise Chernomorneftegaz, which is engaged in oil and gas extraction from the Black Sea shelf, was captured , the property of Ukrainian military units is being stolen etc.
2. If you wrote something in the second square, you have voted for expansion of authorities of the puppet parliament of Crimea pursuant to the Constitution of 1992 ; with such rights the parliament of Crimea will be entitled to make similar decisions without any participation on your part in the future.
For example, this vote was counted - the voter expressed the desire to vest Aksenov with the power to adopt decisions on the destiny of the peninsula without confirmation from the Supreme Council of Ukraine.
Probably this vote was not counted because a dot from the exclamation mark got to the first square.
This voter has grasped the essence of the referendum and marked nothing in the squares.
In addition to lack of choice other totalitarian methods were used during the referendum. On the boxes with the bulletins the "right" vote was marked.
By the estimate of the Committee of voters of Ukraine even such single option referendum was held with fabrications.
The main instrument of fabrication in the opinion of the head of Crimean department of the Committee of voters of Ukraine Andrey Krysko was the simplified procedure of including people into the additional lists directly at the voting station on the voting day. The amount of people that were included into the lists in such fashion in some districts in his view was «abnormal».
Also the expert does not rule out the possibility that after the vote in one voting station the same people by the same procedure could vote in another voting station.
«Also it is entirely possible that the citizens of Russia voted using their Russian passports for identification. Such information appeared in many sources. We consider that the vote took place with employing «ghost voters», because the lists are very old and were not actualized. On one of the voting stations a list as of 1999 was used », - stated Krysko.
He noted that among the observers there were no representatives of any organization, which could have at least a minimal credibility. Furthermore, according to Krysko, the only permitted exit-poll during the «referendum» in Crimea was held by an organization, which has ties to one of the deputies of Simferopol city council, which also raises doubts regarding the accuracy of the collected data.
Hitler gave more options to the people of Austria than Putin gave to Crimeans, at least in the wording of the questions: at the referendum on Anschluss with Germany , which was fabricated on April 10, 1938, one of the possible replies was "NEGATIVE".
I can’t understand why Ukrainian media report nothing about this - there was no choice, Russia and Crimean authorities turned into circus performance, and this advertisement is false.
1. An opinion by the Crimean Tatarian: "We are expecting strong actions from Ukraine". (In Russian)
2 . Self-Defense of Sevastopol - they have something to hide (In Russian).
3 . Illegal annexation of Crimea and the referendum scam.
4 . Russia did not invade Ukraine (in Russian).
5 . Crimea.Ru.Ua. Army, aconomy, predictions, Mass media. March 03-04, 2014, (In Russian).
6 . Military Provocation of Russia in Crimea. The Fight for the South-Eastern Ukraine. 27.02.14 - 01.03.
Likes: