am home!

Sep 16, 2004 17:19

had a lovely time.

highlights included: )

Leave a comment

Comments 10

zandev September 16 2004, 15:13:30 UTC
It was great to see you again after all these years.

I was amused to realise quite how many of the people you knew then are still around. :)

Reply

unknownid September 16 2004, 15:31:25 UTC
mutual! and i thank you for graciously spinning me round the dance floor for the traditional Last (only?) Slow Dance.

it was a night indeed!

it's kind of comforting knowing that a good deal of the oxford crew is more or less preserved in amber. makes me feel secure.

Reply


minniethemoocha September 16 2004, 15:56:20 UTC
Describe the sauce and I shall endeavor to duplicate it next time we make dinner together.

Why on earth do you need an actuary? Sounds perturbingly grim.

That must have been some wedding, bodices exploding and all.

Reply

bateleur September 17 2004, 02:58:48 UTC
Describe the sauce and I shall endeavor to duplicate it next time we make dinner together.

It's basically a blend of Mascarpone, single cream (to thin it a bit) and little chopped bits of various strong-tasting mushrooms. After cooking the result is a mild mushroomy flavour throughout the sauce, which is thick white goo with lots of little dark bits in it.

Reply

unknownid September 17 2004, 05:35:12 UTC
i would like to comment that it is far yummier than Dom's (accurate) morphology implies.

Reply

unknownid September 17 2004, 05:38:08 UTC
Describe the sauce and I shall endeavor to duplicate it next time we make dinner together.
that would be wonderfully delicious, on so many levels.

Why on earth do you need an actuary? Sounds perturbingly grim.
not at all. it's part of my latest hare-brained "what i wanna be when i grow up" scheme. i expect that i will settle on something approximately six weeks before retirement.

coz, actuary? wouldn't that be glamorous? *cocks statistics hat*

Reply


lathany September 17 2004, 01:35:28 UTC
getting a proper bra fitting from a terrifying lady

She's obviously better on bra sizes than charisma.

It was like $60, but I bought the damn bra. and I have to admit, it fits like nothing i have ever worn.

The real question is, will cheaper bras in the new size also fit?

Reply

unknownid September 17 2004, 05:58:43 UTC
She's obviously better on bra sizes than charisma.
well, I don't know, I think the fear and terror may have been a necessary part of the experience.

The real question is, will cheaper bras in the new size also fit?
further experience has yielded: yes, not infallibly, but at a much higher rate than my old size (i.e. more frequently than "never"). although i must say that the super-expensive one does have several excellent design points that i haven't yet found on cheaper ones. also, pretty. but i'm lousy at hand-washing...

the new real question is: will the American size fit? British and American sizes don't correspond exactly. the saga of nina's bosom: more news at seven.

Reply

domestinatrix October 5 2004, 18:19:49 UTC
If your bosom resembles mine as much as i suspect it does, i'd say chances are that you're a 34DD in American sizes and should only buy them at Nordstrom.

I'm wearing a $60 bra right now. I stocked up while they were on sale. The next time you find yourself over here on the Left Coast, i'll bring you to Kim. She'll fetch you plenty of good bras and help you figure out which style is best. I firmly believe that no woman should have to wander around the sales floor trying to pick out her own bras as if they were some simple thing like socks.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up