And so the
temple cleansing begins ........ Its interesting outrageous how a place that prides itself as "open to all irrespective of caste, creed or religion", discriminates based on gender and thats ok. I wonder how we would react if in the 21st century, a well respected temple undertook a huge operation to cleanse itself of the effects of
(
Read more... )
Comments 15
On a related note, did you know that Tamil nadu has opened priesthood of temples to all people who can learn ? It is no longer only for born-as-bramhin folks...
Reply
Tamil Nadu pushing another social reform ... for all the wierd politics in that state, they do seem to manage to make some great changes. I must look this up .... thanks for the pointer!
Reply
This has been a long-standing progressive policy of Karunanidhi, think he tried to implement some such law in the '70s, but the courts intervened. There's more from the Beeb..
Reply
I so wish we could meet and talk - this is a nice segway from the discussions at St Louis....
Reply
Minky said we could all call Sanka tomorrow night ..... hope to catch you then.
Reply
Varshax...I ONEHUNDREDPERCENT agree with you. Love from a fellow-disease....
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
The lady in the middle of the furore - I dont think much of her either. But for completely different reasons. I am not sure why she did it in the first place if she is now going to apologise for her "sin".
Here is a line I have read again and again and have no clue as to what is being alluded to .... I was going to ask Mads, but now you may I may as well ask you :
They take 41 days of rigorous vratham or vow during which period they abstain from sex, smoking, liquor and many other such things. Everyone knows that a female who has attained puberty cannot take 41 days of vratham
To me, it is not very different from a non-believer telling a devout Hindu that it makes no sense to go to a temple where an idol is worshipped.
To me it is very different. This is more like somebody telling the non-believer in question that his intolerence is not tolerated.
It would be interesting to find out how many of the people who don't like the tradition in question are actually interested in ( ... )
Reply
I think we should talk about this, but I will write up a brief description. A lot of what constitutes a visit to the shrine does not seem to be described anywhere. It is not a matter of casually walking up to the doors - it is located atop a hill and Mads can describe how it is now (he visited more recently) but when I went, it required a rigorous climb up, bare-footed, carrying a heavy irumudi (which is supposed to contain offerings to the Lord and all the supplies one would need on such a journey). But before one gets there one takes a vow to abstain from anything Lord Ayyappa himself wouldn't indulge in. One who has taken the vow wears a special garland of beads (the mAla), wears black prominently (so folks around you know you have taken the vow) and visits the temple every day. I don't know how it is in your family, but most women in Kerala don't visit the temple during that time of the month - I think that is what the author is ( ... )
Reply
I believe the practice was put in place to spare women the hardship of the journey and the climb during that time.I am not attacking the original reasons for any of our traditions. Even the caste system has some very logical beginnings. In anycase no one really can know *why*. In the world that I do know, women do not need to be treated like they are "weaker". If a woman wants to train her body for the vigorous climb and related physical ( ... )
Reply
Leave a comment