While conducting a lit review for a psych paper I'm writing on how to measure life satisfaction, I stumbled across this abstract (written by Dr. Easterlin; emphasis mine).
Feeding the Illusion of Growth and Happiness: A Reply to Hagerty and Veenhoven
In a rebuttal of Easterlin (1995), Hagerty and Veenhoven (2003) (see record 2003-05918-001) analyze
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
there was a linguistics paper i read once; the whole thing was a huge diss of the other researchers who study the same topic. i just kept cracking up at the number of times he basically said "there are two main theories on this topic. one is dumb and makes no sense (citation: other dude's studies) and the other is awesome and explains everything (citation: my studies)"
the hilariousness of it was compounded when i went to go speak with him and the entire time he was like "oh my god if you're going to do research please join a psychology department and not a linguistics department; linguists cannot methodology D:"
Reply
So, are you going into grad school? :)
Reply
And grad school's the plan! I'm pretty torn between doing psycholing and studying pragmatics or going full psych and studying human sexuality though.
Reply
Reply
You'll probably appreciate this- know what the next beginner's MMP I'm working on is? Two paleontology teams in the late 1800s clashing over a rich site, based on the historical Battle of the Bones between Othniel Marsh and Edward Drinker Cope. Now, these guys seriously dedicated themselves to destroying each other, and got on worse than the US and USSR. I'm going to use some excerpts from their works =)
I love academia.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment