Just an article

Jul 18, 2007 21:56

...about biofuels, and how they suck.

LinkyGenerally it's what you'd expect: there is no such thing as free energy, and leveraging plant photosynthesis is a great idea that probably still won't be feasible. He doesn't get into it, but I suspect the problem is the underlying energy economy -- all those cars are consuming more energy than hits our ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 6

xannoside July 19 2007, 13:00:17 UTC
Makes sense.

My question is, could you make viable biofuels from waste oils? For example, the millions of tonnes of waste oil used and discarded everyday by the fast-food industry.

Reply

wellgull July 19 2007, 15:23:00 UTC
See, now *this* is the only part of the biofuels thing that really has legs.

The problem is that waste = useful energy in the wrong place. We need to use that useful but unused energy, not try to shunt energy that's currently *being* used for things like food.

Reply


kokoinai July 19 2007, 15:34:23 UTC
My major complaint with biofuels (corn, particularly) is that they drive the price up. Yes, that's right, getting our fuel from ourselves instead of the Middle East will cause basic staples to be even more unaffordable for the poor. Sounds like a great trade-off to me.

Reply

wellgull July 21 2007, 15:22:22 UTC
Well, if we could somehow figure out how to make cars run on high fructose corn syrup, we'd be golden, since it's something that absolutely no one actually needs :) But yeah, the economics of "biofuels" as they're currently proposed don't make sense, whether it's the energy economy or the monetary one.

Reply


trinityvixen July 20 2007, 15:22:27 UTC
There's also the fact that the plans in place, like to put ethanol in cars, are so completely wrong for our lazy-ass system of car ownership that it would definitely do more harm than good even if it sucked in greenhouse gases and emitted fresh air with a pine scent (thank you, robot X1!). Ethanol-petrol mixtures require special engines to run cleanly without destroying your car. We live in a country where people have cars that are twenty-thirty years old, and older. You really think they'll all dump them for the new ones (which are thrice as expensive) for this fuel?

I swear, this was the same complaint against it in Australia FOUR YEARS AGO when I was there and they were trying out this ethanol-petrol mix. Sheesh. Biofuels my ass.

Reply

wellgull July 21 2007, 15:20:57 UTC
The outdated-car issue is actually a significant one; if everybody had new cars we'd already emit less of the greenhouse gases, since new cars tend to get better gas mileage (those mammoth land yachts excepted). If people were going to buy new cars for petrol reasons, they might as well just buy hybrids...

As for the rest, well, we're at least four years behind the rest of the world. But old, dumb ideas can be maintained indefinitely if they've got the life support of some massively rich person's potential profit.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up