Livejournal
Log in
Post
Friends
My journal
windycitylover
...
Dec 21, 2005 14:45
(
Read more...
)
Leave a comment
Comments 24
schuco
December 21 2005, 20:12:38 UTC
No, because the more time you spend with them the more money it costs. So if one hour costs five dollars than 5 hours would cost 25 dollars.
Reply
windycitylover
December 21 2005, 21:08:40 UTC
Whether you are right or not, that's not what it says.
It says girls are "time and money," which implies "time + money."
Therefore, it's flawed.
Reply
schuco
December 21 2005, 21:19:52 UTC
Yeah, but that's a semantics problem, not a mathematical problem.
Reply
windycitylover
December 21 2005, 23:10:47 UTC
But it becomes a math problem because the math is bad based on the information stated.
Nowhere does it say that girls cost money BASED on how much time is involved.
It could be a flat fee that you pay one time only, which is the best assumption based on the information.
Reply
Thread 22
tag_you_r_it
December 22 2005, 23:27:48 UTC
i can't believe i read all this...
___my brain itches.
Reply
windycitylover
December 23 2005, 05:38:54 UTC
You think that's bad? I just got ALL of the comment replies from this post at once. I got 23 new e-mails, and they were ALL comment replies from this post. Gah!
Reply
Leave a comment
Up
Comments 24
Reply
It says girls are "time and money," which implies "time + money."
Therefore, it's flawed.
Reply
Reply
Nowhere does it say that girls cost money BASED on how much time is involved.
It could be a flat fee that you pay one time only, which is the best assumption based on the information.
Reply
___my brain itches.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment