RAEG

Nov 13, 2010 16:51

Leave a comment

Comments 5

terrycloth November 14 2010, 01:45:37 UTC
So, no chance that China will all catch the gay instead? :/

Reply


kirizal November 14 2010, 02:04:53 UTC
For that I think we humans would have to suck less...

Reply


austin_dern November 15 2010, 03:57:16 UTC

It's often quipped that the logical result of studying humanity is misanthropy, and ... well, it's one of those things that has maybe too much bite to it.

I don't know any easy way to make things better, but maybe this will help: there are more people offended by the atrocities you name today than there were a century ago (modulo the atrocities which are new to today, compared to those of 1910). Less of this is considered normal or decent or acceptable than used to be. Simply disapproving may not seem like much, but the change in attitude is the start of the change in behavior, and the change in behavior is the start of the change in morality. Humanity is, as best as this can be measured, better-behaved than it used to be, and more of it is taking as assumption that it must become better-behaved.

Reply

yellow3 November 27 2010, 02:44:40 UTC
I don't know, Austin. Sure, we may be appalled by the atrocities if we are forced to acknowledge they exist, but for many people they are probably news. The horrors of Rwanda, which we just stood on the bylines for, never made it much into the western press. Far as I knew we just ignored it because it was just a bunch of black people and there was no oil there; I wasn't aware that it was because we'd basically gone in, made a mess of Somalia a few years before and decided that the deaths of 18 solders as a result of our imperialist blundering meant that it was time to just let the "savages" kill each other and turn isolationist again ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up