Look. If I were to marry a successful women and love her dearly, I would gladly sacrifice for her. If she thinks it is necessary for me to stay home and take care of the kids I would happily do so. I would happily stay home and doo house work, cook, and take care of the kids. I love cooking
( ... )
Saif! This is the internet! My "boyish-sex-fantasies" does not exist in this form. See my replies to Irene for my explanations. I am every bit feminist as I claim to be. Ask max or brian. They were the ones to coin that term for me.`
Did I call you that that time when you told me that you said you wouldn't want to have sex with someone you weren't in love with, and that you didn't really find any real appeal in the act, and that you thought 90% of it was themental-love part? Well then, I should have just said that you were a sentimentalist.
You're a strange mix.
Also, I'm going to try and avoid branding people with the term feminist, there's just too many different camps.
You're absolutely correct about my view on sex. Sure the act may be pleasurable some how, but without love it's nothing. I state once again that I'll only do it if I love her. And 90% sounds about right.
Okay! I am a sentimentalist until if I become a senator and start voting for women's rights bills.
Good idea. You see my short theory has set off a storm and offended a few people. I'm pretty sure Irene and the other girl hate my guts now.
I've learned my lesson; I'll stay off gender issues from now on.
I am surprised that you do not have more shame as you respond to the comments that you have been given. You seem to believe that you are a moral person and that all that you do is correct. But would it be considered right to base your idea of success in wealth. And I doubt that you will be flying your million dollar jet so as to pay visits to those that are sadly dying as a result of starvation or lack of sanitation. And who can judge that women are not as successful as they desire to be, it is possible that not all think as you do and prefer to take their lives in directions other than politics. Even if this is not true there has been a slight drawback on the achievements of women due to the restrictions of womens rights due to men that think as you in believing that there is a superior gender and mind. It is also frustrating how you are pitying those that are pregnant and find a reason to rejoice when a women returns to her work after having a child. Is it so uncommon for this to happen? I don't appreciate your sympathy as
( ... )
As a matter of fact, I plan to "fly my million dollar jet to visti those that are in poverty". I would be doing exactly what Bill Gates and Melinda Gates are doing. I look up to them, and I think they are right in spending money to find out what needs finicial asistance. I doubt I can ever be Bono, but the Gates are doing everything they can in giving back to the world. As a matter of fact, they have given away over 32 billion dollars to date out of their 40 billion. My view of money is that it is better to have it than not. I do not wish to be one of those people who live in poverty and pretend money doesn't matter. I plan to get a comfortable living and donate the rest. Take a look at all the stars and successuful business people. Paul Allen has a plane, and yet he still donates much to society
( ... )
1. The Harvard president phrased it more as a hypothesis that maybe there are innate differences. Here's a Boston Globe article on it. http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/01/17/summers_remarks_on_women_draw_fire?mode=PF If you can pose it as a question that can be be tested, then I think it's okay to say that it mighht be a possible reason, but if the evidence doesn't support it should be thrown away. But, if the evidence does support it, I think it's unethical to throw away the results because it's non-PC. Personally, I believe that one sex probably doesn't have more of an aptitude in math than the other, it's probably just sociological reasons, but I don't think we should hang the guy from the tallest tree.
Look at the junior class, most of the top spots in math and science are held by the girls.
also! why would a girl not approve of buying a boat? Those hot girls that Irene's comment reffered to do not dissaprove of buying boats and I am sure that once their husbands die they will go "Fuck what am I supposed to this boat! What have i gotten myself into!".
If you read my responses, you'll find that I admitted that buying a boat might be acceptable. I detect a hint of sarcarsm here, and I don't get it entirely. But to answer the quote, she can sell it. Boats have decent resale values. It's her choice. After marriage, whatever the man or wife accomplishes or buys belong to both of them. Once the man die, she shall decide to do anything she wants to do with their property. Also! Who are you!
Think of all the things that wouldn't exist if people were asexual, all the wonderful things like Romeo and Juliet, How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, and masturbation.
Haha. Okay! I admit defeat! This would never work! Because we are humans!!! I am human, and I was merely thinking outside of the box. Newton and Eistein tought outside of the box. My theory is a form of science fiction.
Romeo and Juliet was written perhaps by a gay poet, so that disqualifies your argument. Yes, Shakespeare kept a male companion. What I did or did not do I do not even want to think about.
Don't even mention mastrubation with me; you know I am catholic.:) What's wrong with you?
Ok then you think that my theory wasn't outrageous? Outrageous theories are popular and outrageous books will sell. Ie sound and the fury.
If you think my mind is closed, then elighten me with your open mind. Tell me what you think. tell me what you believe is right. Influence me with your righteousness instead of merely putting down my science fiction theories.
Comments 79
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
You're a strange mix.
Also, I'm going to try and avoid branding people with the term feminist, there's just too many different camps.
Sorry.
Reply
Okay! I am a sentimentalist until if I become a senator and start voting for women's rights bills.
Good idea. You see my short theory has set off a storm and offended a few people. I'm pretty sure Irene and the other girl hate my guts now.
I've learned my lesson; I'll stay off gender issues from now on.
Reply
Reply
Reply
http://www.boston.com/news/education/higher/articles/2005/01/17/summers_remarks_on_women_draw_fire?mode=PF
If you can pose it as a question that can be be tested, then I think it's okay to say that it mighht be a possible reason, but if the evidence doesn't support it should be thrown away. But, if the evidence does support it, I think it's unethical to throw away the results because it's non-PC. Personally, I believe that one sex probably doesn't have more of an aptitude in math than the other, it's probably just sociological reasons, but I don't think we should hang the guy from the tallest tree.
Look at the junior class, most of the top spots in math and science are held by the girls.
Reply
Hmm, you're right about the junior class. There are, however, you, me and Theron. We're the good old gang of three from buhler's class.
Reply
Reply
Also! Who are you!
Reply
Reply
Romeo and Juliet was written perhaps by a gay poet, so that disqualifies your argument. Yes, Shakespeare kept a male companion. What I did or did not do I do not even want to think about.
Don't even mention mastrubation with me; you know I am catholic.:) What's wrong with you?
Reply
Reply
If you think my mind is closed, then elighten me with your open mind. Tell me what you think. tell me what you believe is right. Influence me with your righteousness instead of merely putting down my science fiction theories.
Show me an "open" mind.
Reply
Leave a comment