According to Richard Dawkins's The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution, "Unlike eggs, sperms are too small to go it alone. Asexual reproduction in animals means dispensing with males."
So it serves my best interests (and yours) that humans are not an asexual species.
Then we don't need males! Males are unnessary for the surival of humanity. Females are humanity's treasures. You can go with few males, but you can't go with few females.
And asexual reproduction does not require gametic union. So no point in having gametes.
And that quote is obvious! The egg is the largest human cell and the sperm is the smallest. The sperm is merely a nucleus with a flagella; what good does that do?
I nominate myself as one of the elite alpha "breeder" males (the rest will be used for manual labor, and custodial jobs), to be used to continue the survival of humanity in the upcoming gynocracy.
i am no one of importance; do not worry. your points were interesting but i still have no respect for them. and also, an apology would be nice. max, youre funny.. how to lose a guy in 10 days
I am sorry for any offense I might have caused. But this is the internet. I have to ask. Do you have no respect for the Gates as well? From my understanding, my beliefs are based sorely on the American dream and belief. - Get rich, be comfortable, and donate the rest.
Hey I didn't know this many people hated me. I suppose I should go cry for "my sorry self". On another thought, who do people respond to livejournals? It's all nonsense according to you. We don't learn anything. I think it is suppose to be a place that ideas can be exchanged. Including ideas like "I dislike you".
This post brings up many things that I have considered myself. Yes, being asexual would take many many casualties out of life, but in fact, some people (men included) enjoy the romantic frilly shit. (Mr. Regan, for example). As much as I may be sexually frustrated, I have been in love: something that not only incorporates sexual satiation, but also a relationship, a love for the other participating human being.
Love, in my opinion, what the human race lives for - is not based on sex.
Comments 79
According to Richard Dawkins's The Ancestor's Tale: A Pilgrimage to the Dawn of Evolution, "Unlike eggs, sperms are too small to go it alone. Asexual reproduction in animals means dispensing with males."
So it serves my best interests (and yours) that humans are not an asexual species.
Reply
Then we don't need males! Males are unnessary for the surival of humanity. Females are humanity's treasures. You can go with few males, but you can't go with few females.
And asexual reproduction does not require gametic union. So no point in having gametes.
And that quote is obvious! The egg is the largest human cell and the sperm is the smallest. The sperm is merely a nucleus with a flagella; what good does that do?
Reply
Reply
Reply
I have to ask. Do you have no respect for the Gates as well?
From my understanding, my beliefs are based sorely on the American dream and belief. - Get rich, be comfortable, and donate the rest.
Reply
He obviously just wanted attention for his sorry self.
Reply
I suppose I should go cry for "my sorry self".
On another thought, who do people respond to livejournals? It's all nonsense according to you. We don't learn anything.
I think it is suppose to be a place that ideas can be exchanged. Including ideas like "I dislike you".
Reply
Love, in my opinion, what the human race lives for - is not based on sex.
Reply
Reply
Reply
hahaha ?
Go study for French.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment