I am, lately, horrified by what I don't know, and what I know now that I never did before. I am passionate, because despite my having said it before, I am aware now of why Holocaust education needs to be revised in the coming years. How, for G-d's sake, can we teach it without talking about Bosnia, Kosovo, Rwanda, Darfur? How many names do I not
(
Read more... )
Comments 13
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
As for the other ones, we can just ignore them because they happen in unimportant countries, like Burma. We can ignore North Korea because their problems are the fault of their government, we already have economic sanctions on them, and there's no way anyone could actually enter to help the people there.
By the way, a comment from my cousin about the Darfur rally in DC. "Everywhere I looked, everyone was Jewish."
Reply
My experience in studying genocide is significantly different than yours. In studying the Armenian Genocide, for example, I learned that what is most wanted by the Armenian diaspora is recognition that a genocide took place and a return to their country. Armenia, as it stands now, is not historical Armenia, or it's a small rather insignificant piece of it. Historical Armenia is actually in present day Turkey.
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Here's the question I have for you about Latin America. So, unlike the U.S. and Canada, there has been a significant amount of marriage between in Indians and Spaniards there. So, given that most people are descended from both conquistadors and the conquered, how do they teach history?
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment