[024]

[yousoundblue]

[audio // English]

Torn's back!

[Lika loev Torn! :3]

Baijznyherglert'allalax! Or anyone, really.

What determines which mind-state recording you use when you bring someone back? Is his old one corrupt? Your procedure doesn't seem robust. If this is experimental it's very unethical not to get consent first.

Comments

[autodiagnose]

[/ping on "experimental."]

I am versed in the concept of consent. Please clarify "unethical."

[Yeah, AMU can look it up, but it's different hearing it from a human.]

[yousoundblue]

[Blink blink.

She asks her helpmate and then rattles off the dictionary definition.]

Not morally approvable.

[autodiagnose]

Morality: Arbitrarily-enforced standards of behavior by which group acceptance is determined and unit cohesion is maintained.

Is this accurate?

[yousoundblue]

No.

[diverged_fate]

Mind-state recording? Sounds like you're talking about a machine...

[yousoundblue]

A neural read/write setup. They seem to have a very flexible one here, but they don't use it particularly well.

[diverged_fate]

Wait, you mean like... messing with someone's brain? Why's that even necessary?

[yousoundblue]

No. It's just a read. Non-destructive.

Don't you want to have some continuity of personality in the case of an accident?

[She may be the only passenger on the ship not bothered by the resurrections.]