i get more superficial every day...

Mar 29, 2004 22:50


as usual, i've been thinking about sex. if you can't answer the questions without specific facts or want to leave more lengthly remarks, feel free to drop a comment.

Poll put out or get out

Leave a comment

Comments 48

dilatedeyes March 29 2004, 20:07:34 UTC
my head is going to explode from the pressure of this poll.

to me, sex is important and i want it all the time. but then, all my relationships fail miserably and i suppose that perhaps i should change my views... which is why i answered the way i did.

Reply

aventurine March 29 2004, 20:11:06 UTC
how much of your self-esteem is tied to whether or not you get laid when you're in a relationship? seems to me that there are a lot of factors that influence your chances when you're single... but if you're with someone...

Reply

dilatedeyes March 29 2004, 20:24:23 UTC
way too much of my self-esteem! but then again, with both of you and your horrible schedules.. it's hard to fit things in, i guess, to put it not so gracefully. :)

Reply

aventurine March 29 2004, 20:27:49 UTC
i agree, i feel the same way. and i'll admit i have a bit of a double standard: i think girls should be able to say no for any reason at any time, but i think a guy had better have a damn good reason.

Reply


kingtycoon March 29 2004, 20:22:08 UTC
unless by not enough you mean none ever under any circumstances then no.

Reply

aventurine March 29 2004, 20:25:22 UTC
no, i just mean infrequent. infrequent to me is anything less than once a week. dr. phil says something like 20 million americans are living in "sexless" marriages!

Reply

kingtycoon March 29 2004, 20:38:42 UTC
yeah, he also says he's a doctor. Just because they aren't having sex with each other doesn't mean they aren't having sex. Touche dr. Phil!

Sex is a pretty lame part of any relationship I think - I think there are a lot of much more useful things people can do for each other than lick on their privates to show affection and devotion.

Reply

aventurine March 29 2004, 20:40:48 UTC
what other things do you suggest, then?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

aventurine April 5 2004, 07:12:49 UTC
thanks for your thoughts on this. i think they're essentially the same as mine. however, things have gone sour since all this. i'll have to tell you the whole story.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

aventurine April 5 2004, 19:10:11 UTC
i would love to talk about it. i need help.

Reply


shkoo March 29 2004, 20:33:04 UTC
Yeah, I'm all about the 3-somes. I think I need to get 2 bi chicks to move in with me. That way when I'm not feeling particulary libidous they can bump clams with each other.

Reply

aventurine March 29 2004, 20:35:43 UTC
why do you prefer threesomes? so you can perform less, or more? :)

Reply

jjjiii March 29 2004, 21:00:09 UTC
I think there's something to be said for variety, but I've never been able to get the emotionality of a 3some to work out right. I've never actually been in one, but while the idea has great appeal on paper, when it has ever come close to being put into practice, I find things seem to become shakey and fall apart. I guess achieving that level of trust (or not giving a shit) is just not an easy thing.

Reply

shkoo March 29 2004, 21:55:15 UTC
It gives flexibility. If I want to perform less they can go at each other or if I want to perform more there's more opportunity to do so. The same is true for everyone else involved. I had a 3-some this weekend and one of the lovely ladies was on the rag so she didn't need to get much play. The other one was pretty nympho, so good for her. :)

I have a group of 3 gay friends that are all together, so I know the emotional stuff does work out for some people. I'm not familiar (nor do I want to be) with the details of their sex life, though. :)

Reply


roses_rejoice March 29 2004, 20:53:53 UTC
if sex (either having more of it or less of it) is truly an important value to you, then you should try to find someone whose values match yours. if you don't care that much about sex compared to other values such as spending habits, time spent with family, etc. then it's not that big of a deal.

people shouldn't be afraid to be honest about what's important to them. i think there's some kind of weird dichotomy in our society that sex is superimportant and at the same time, superficial. i say, let's just forget what other people think of us and if we want sex say so and don't want it say so too and try to find someone who fits with what we want. for myself, there's no way i could stay with a guy who put a big importance on having regular sex, either because he "needed" that or felt like proving his manhood or whatever. i've had that before and it got real, real, REAL annoying and probably would have broke us up eventually if other things hadn't beaten the sex issue to it.

Reply

aventurine March 30 2004, 20:00:36 UTC
well, i'm afraid i might be doing the same thing. maybe i'm demanding it all the time just to prove my desirability? but what am i supposed to do about that even if it is the case? that's what i want to do...

Reply

roses_rejoice March 31 2004, 03:13:01 UTC
if it's what you want it's what you want. i'd then take the next step and ask why the other person isn't giving it to you. like someone said above, is it a case of something practical, such as your partner being on a different schedule from you, or just being physically tired sometimes? or are they being withholding as a way of exerting control, or giving you some reason to feel undesirable? it's all in the dynamics of the situation, and whether you feel this is something that you want to "get past" in your own mind (i.e. make sex less important), or whether you would just like somebody who has more sex at this point, and that's the end of it. the other thing to look at is how long the relationship has been going on, if this is someone you don't have a gigantic shared history with and the bloom is already off the rose sexually speaking then i wouldn't bother hanging around. but that's just me.

Reply

aventurine March 31 2004, 19:21:55 UTC
i don't think it's anything he's doing intentionally. the poor boy works from 7am-4:30pm daily, then goes to law school from 6pm-9pm. so you're probably wondering how he's even alive, let alone having sex, right?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up