I just heard back from the Journal of Neuroscience. My paper is "potentially suitable for publication", but first it needs "major revisions". Not the experiments we expected them to ask for, but others I would have liked to have done if my old BayMate hadn't moved back to China. And possibly more of the morphometric analysis, which will take a
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
I went and reread the comments. They're not as bad as I first thought (though I still don't think they're great). It probably doesn't help that I'm crampy and hormonal. Everything looks worse under those circumstances.
And my PI did say this: "you don’t often see words like amazing and exceptional in a paper review".
I'm going to try to look on the bright side for the rest of the weekend. After I take some ibuprofen...
Reply
Congratulations, of course, for getting good reviews, and you absolutely deserve to be happy. Just maybe not immediately.
One of the grad students in my lab is going through the same process -- the reviews have been great, but somehow he's had to do two rounds of revisions. I feel like paper reviews are getting to be like NIH grants, in that they just want you to revise almost for the sake of revision, regardless of how actually on-point the critiques are. I think it's dumb.
Reply
Reply
Talk soon, peace!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment