I love this translator. So far I have covered Baudelaire, Vonnegut, Kafka, Burroughs, and Dostoevsky. This is C.G. Jung as a 12 year old AOLer
( Read more... )
Pretty funnyparadox777January 28 2004, 18:02:49 UTC
But I have to add my two cents in seriousness. As far as I'm concerned, thoughts (mind, states, etc.) are, in fact, entirely spatial. All things are material (at least simpliciter). My mental states are a combination of electricity and chemicals, and my inability to intuit this is no strong evidence to the contrary. Also, he means a fourth temporal dimension, I would assume, since a being of the fourth dimension would have infinitely many spatial three-dimensional parts, just as we have infinitely many spatial two-dimensional parts
( ... )
Re: Pretty funnycecil_beeJanuary 28 2004, 20:54:33 UTC
You seem to think that I am a Jung follower. Fuck bringing all that spiritual bullshit into pyschology. All of my beliefs stem from the knowledge that all things are spatial, hence the atheism/nihilism/secular humanism. I also have huge problems with him trying to prove that all thoughts are purely objective. I put Modern Man's Search for a Soul down when I hit that point and refused to put any more time into reading Jung. If you want to argue about Jung talk to Michael or Erin. I only used the that piece because it was funny.
Re: Pretty funnyparadox777January 29 2004, 04:56:17 UTC
That's hilarious, you sound offended! Anyway, it's only because Mike buys into it that I felt the need to post; I wasn't really arguing with you. :) I'm a materialist, myself. I don't think that atheism follows from materialism, though. In fact, I think that theism follows logically from the Principle of Necessary Reason, which is entirely unarguable (if you try to argue against it, you're probably thinking of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, which can be reduced ad absurdem given certain logical assumptions). But that's for a different, longer, not-5-in-the-morning-before-a-noon-midterm post.
I was translating this passage on the babelfish translator (babelfish.altavista.com) and I got this after going to japanese, then spanish, then english: "Those are small, great, long, fine, heavy, flow, circular rectum, or what?" Where the hell did rectum come from???
Yes, I'm bored...paradox777January 28 2004, 18:47:27 UTC
mangled further: The different difficulty points in the position of the function of the soul and this uncertain one is added: the indices of the soul, inside it, removes the kingdom of prosecution of direction from the space where it is not generally. We are an emission of possibility: that type of the type of size of the thought? They are small, this company and that, that one is long, that one and well, that the flow and rectum are weighed to circulate, or that? He has the thought that he spreads for it, and in the good station of order, the dimension of the space that 4 things where the expiration of the time becomes, if becomes then in existence, then our model must improve not the fact that gives form to the image, but that thing which is living.
Just getting started:paradox777January 28 2004, 19:05:38 UTC
Redneck: To this hyar unsartinty about th' localizashun of psychic funckshuns t'other difficulty is added, cuss it all t' tarnation. Psychic corntents in juneral is non-spatial 'cept in th' particular realm of sensashun. Whut in tarnation bulk kin we ascribe t'thunks? Is they small, large, long, thin, heavy, fluid, straight, circular, o' whut? Eff'n we wished t'fo'm a vivid pitcher of a non-spatial bein' of th' fourth dimenshun, we sh'd does fine t'take thunk, as a bein', fo' our model, ah reckon.
Re: Just getting started:cecil_beeJanuary 28 2004, 23:38:47 UTC
I put the redneck translation through the 12 year AOLer translator and ended up with this: 2 THIS HYAR UNSARTINTY ABOUT TH LOCALIZASHUN OF PSYCHIC FUNKSHUNS TOTH3R DIFICULTY IS ADED CUS IT AL T TARNATION1!1!!!! OMG WTF PSYCHIC CORNT3NTS IN JUNERAL IS NON-SPATIAL CEPT IN TH PARTICULAR RAALM OF SENSASHUN11!! OMG WHUT IN TARNATION BULK KIN WE ASCRIEB TTHUNKS???!?!? OMG LOL IS THEY SMAL LARGE LONG THIN HAAVY FLUID STRAGEHT CIRCULAR O WHUT????! WTF LOL 3FN WA WISHAD TFOM A VIVID PITCHER OF A NON-SPATIAL BIN OF TH FOURTH DIEMNSHUN W3 SHD DOES FIEN TTAEK THUNK AS A BIN FO OUR MODAL AH R3KON111!1 OMG WTF
Comments 9
Reply
Also, he means a fourth temporal dimension, I would assume, since a being of the fourth dimension would have infinitely many spatial three-dimensional parts, just as we have infinitely many spatial two-dimensional parts ( ... )
Reply
Reply
I'm a materialist, myself. I don't think that atheism follows from materialism, though. In fact, I think that theism follows logically from the Principle of Necessary Reason, which is entirely unarguable (if you try to argue against it, you're probably thinking of the Principle of Sufficient Reason, which can be reduced ad absurdem given certain logical assumptions). But that's for a different, longer, not-5-in-the-morning-before-a-noon-midterm post.
Reply
Reply
The different difficulty points in the position of the function of the soul and this uncertain one is added: the indices of the soul, inside it, removes the kingdom of prosecution of direction from the space where it is not generally. We are an emission of possibility: that type of the type of size of the thought? They are small, this company and that, that one is long, that one and well, that the flow and rectum are weighed to circulate, or that? He has the thought that he spreads for it, and in the good station of order, the dimension of the space that 4 things where the expiration of the time becomes, if becomes then in existence, then our model must improve not the fact that gives form to the image, but that thing which is living.
Reply
To this hyar unsartinty about th' localizashun of psychic funckshuns t'other difficulty is added, cuss it all t' tarnation. Psychic corntents in juneral is non-spatial 'cept in th' particular realm of sensashun. Whut in tarnation bulk kin we ascribe t'thunks? Is they small, large, long, thin, heavy, fluid, straight, circular, o' whut? Eff'n we wished t'fo'm a vivid pitcher of a non-spatial bein' of th' fourth dimenshun, we sh'd does fine t'take thunk, as a bein', fo' our model, ah reckon.
Reply
2 THIS HYAR UNSARTINTY ABOUT TH LOCALIZASHUN OF PSYCHIC FUNKSHUNS TOTH3R DIFICULTY IS ADED CUS IT AL T TARNATION1!1!!!! OMG WTF PSYCHIC CORNT3NTS IN JUNERAL IS NON-SPATIAL CEPT IN TH PARTICULAR RAALM OF SENSASHUN11!! OMG WHUT IN TARNATION BULK KIN WE ASCRIEB TTHUNKS???!?!? OMG LOL IS THEY SMAL LARGE LONG THIN HAAVY FLUID STRAGEHT CIRCULAR O WHUT????! WTF LOL 3FN WA WISHAD TFOM A VIVID PITCHER OF A NON-SPATIAL BIN OF TH FOURTH DIEMNSHUN W3 SHD DOES FIEN TTAEK THUNK AS A BIN FO OUR MODAL AH R3KON111!1 OMG WTF
I am so bored. wtf
Reply
Give America a few more years, we aren't that far off. Those rednecks will eventually have the internet.
Reply
Leave a comment