(Untitled)

Feb 14, 2015 06:24

This is one of those 'should I laugh until I cry, go pound someone into the ground or both' situations ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 10

thwippersnapple February 14 2015, 14:54:04 UTC
Oh my god.. What a horrible person! To have the nerve to ask for the last puppy after being responsible for the death of the others blows my mind. But to try to sue?! I hope this woman never gets approved to adopt ANY creature since she seems to lack a conscience or basic intelligence. I am so angry for those animals..

Reply


chocolate_frapp February 14 2015, 16:29:03 UTC
oh god, how awful! (if it's of any consolation at all, the suit will get thrown out of court immediately once the judge gets the details.)

Reply


yfael February 14 2015, 17:31:15 UTC
I can't even D: Usually one needs a PSL to can't even properly, but eff that. Whyyyyyyyyyyy would any of that have sounded like a good idea to anyone? Going into a room with PARVO puppies sounds like one of the worst ideas EVER, I've a Vet Assistant, I'd rather clean up anal gland residue than handle parvo poo. I feel so sorry for those puppies and the resources that have been wasted on them for her stupid selfish actions. I'd love to beat her with a shovel :(

Reply


ainoko_ironrose February 14 2015, 19:46:33 UTC
I'd fire the brother over his sister's actions as whatever she does reflects on him. I hope that this case gets tossed out with the judge laughing his tail off from the stupidity she is exhibiting.

Reply


gritsinmisery February 14 2015, 21:17:38 UTC
Oh, I think the TV stations need to hear about this one. Even if it's only a 15-second "Can you believe this?" end-of-news-broadcast blurb, it'd be quite appropriate.

"A local woman is suing the Human Society for refusing to let her adopt a sole surviving puppy after she caused the death of fifteen others by spreading Parvo among them while trespassing in the isolation ward at the Chesterfield location [an example; I have no idea which location you work at.] When we contacted the lawyer representing the Society, he laughed for two solid minutes and then declined to comment." I can hear several of the Channel 5 broadcasters saying this.

And I think you could probably work up some conflict-of-interest thingumy where you could justify tossing Brother out on his ass because he's associated with someone suing you guys.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up