Hahaha. Not

Aug 31, 2009 17:01

I just went over to look at that fan fiction survey that's whipping up a frothy kerfuffle. Didn't look at the survey itself, which I don't intend to take, just browsed the comments. ETA The survey's down now while they lick their wounds, I guess ( Read more... )

rant

Leave a comment

Comments 107

jenlev August 31 2009, 22:35:31 UTC
That survey makes me want to headdesk repeatedly. I'm rather impressed with the comments. If only the two dudes who put that so called survey together could experience a teaching moment. The title of their book alone suggests they're not so much into learning.

:::dusts off Daniel WTF icon:::

Reply

janedavitt August 31 2009, 22:37:42 UTC
I would like to unleash Sam on them. Or Janet ::is wistful::

Reply

jenlev August 31 2009, 22:47:19 UTC
Ah, now you've got me thinking about how some other characters might respond to them. Fraser and Ray K, Aeryn Sun. Geoffrey Tennant. :::nods:::

PS. I really should leave out Daniel Jackson. He'd have them for lunch on a platter.

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 00:11:04 UTC
He would! ::shakes pom poms::

Reply


cross_stitchery August 31 2009, 22:57:06 UTC
oh dear god... i missed all this. just saw the survey and one fan's response (see my post) but i didn't realise how totally moronic these people are.

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 00:10:38 UTC
They hit new heights of idiocy :-(

Reply


nialla42 September 1 2009, 00:07:04 UTC
Ah, don't you love it when entitled yet oh so ignorant menfolk clomp into a mostly female arena, then essentially say, "We're going to explain your sexuality to you!"?

Hey, think this is the guys from FanLib back for round two? ;)

ETA OMG, the title of their book is 'RULE 34: WHAT NETPORN TEACHES US ABOUT THE BRAIN.'

My icon is offended.

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 00:09:44 UTC
As well it might be ::growls::

The FanLib deja vu is epic.

Reply

nialla42 September 1 2009, 01:32:40 UTC
I've been reading over more of the commentary, and I think the "researchers" are of the type that already have the answers they want, and we're messing them up with actual facts.

Right now they're still in the slightly placating/patronizing mode of "But don't you understand? We want to bring academic attention to you! Male academics! That will completely legitimize something fans have been doing for about forty years."

I'm eagerly awaiting word of their first flouncy flavored "Mean girls! No wonder you do nothing but write porn, because you couldn't get sex any other way" post. It's either that or they'll completely drop off the radar.

Also, my other icon is offended. ;)

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 15:54:20 UTC
The Crack Van poster who sponsored them is saying much the same thing already which is making my teeth grit slightly.

Reply


crayonbreakygal September 1 2009, 00:19:21 UTC
Wow, epic fail on their part. Research anyone? Glad I missed that one.

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 15:48:22 UTC
If it comes back, I will be astonished.

Reply


slipperieslope September 1 2009, 00:30:37 UTC
Dr. Ogi Ogas and Dr. Sai Gaddam, Department of Cognitive and Neural Systems, Boston University need some remedial studies.

Reply

janedavitt September 1 2009, 15:48:38 UTC
Or a swift kick up the arse...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up