I want to talk about oppression.

Nov 14, 2009 18:25

This is probably only vaguely related to this community, but I figure y'all are probably cool with off-topic rants 'n' rambles, and it is a subject that likely affects everyone in some way.

cut for those who don't care about being PC. Be forewarned: lots of swearing! )

language, banjololo, semantics

Leave a comment

Comments 22

lastiheard November 15 2009, 02:36:44 UTC
please don't delete this entry.

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 03:16:51 UTC
hokay

Reply


algomuyraro November 15 2009, 02:38:34 UTC
well, you can't make everyone(/thing) happy all the time.

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 02:40:53 UTC
True. But I'm just trying not to use oppressive language.

Reply


down_wind November 15 2009, 03:07:19 UTC
Is the term "vegetative" used in the context of a person who has been in a coma oppressive to plant matter?

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 03:16:44 UTC
Personally I don't think so, because it's meant to be a descriptor, not an insult.

Reply

headrushfiction November 15 2009, 04:35:15 UTC
actually, i've always cringed a little at the use of "vegetative", but i'm not sure why. maybe because it's so closely related to calling someone a "vegetable"? it just sounds so dehumanizing. which i suppose isn't exactly oppressive to plant matter, but i can't tell if that was sarcasm on your part or not anyway.

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 04:49:15 UTC
Good point, haha I was only thinking from the point of view of a plant, not from that of the person in a coma. I guess if someone is offended by being called vegetative then they shouldn't be called that. But either way I don't think it's oppressive.

Reply


sayyoudo November 15 2009, 03:39:08 UTC
what is this i don't even

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 03:51:19 UTC
Hmmm, yeah I think you're right... I really see what you're saying here. Good point!

Reply


headrushfiction November 15 2009, 04:32:17 UTC
this is something i've been struggling with a lot lately too. i really want my language to be inclusive and respectful, but you're right - it seems there is no non-oppressive way to insult someone. and so much of what we say is awfully deeply ingrained that it's hard to be conscious of it all the time ( ... )

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 04:57:28 UTC
Could you expand on reasons behind not using "gender variant" and "queer"? My routine for deciding whether a term is inclusive pretty much consists of deciding whether I could use the term not only to describe many different people, but also to describe myself. I don't identify within the gender binary, but I don't currently identify as anything that begins with the prefix "trans." Therefore I use "gender variant" because it seems much more inclusive. Similarly, I don't identify as L, G, B, or T- but I also don't identify as straight- so "queer" seems to me to be a better blanket term. I've always disliked the lumping together of "T" with the rest of the queer soup, because gender identity is such a different concept from sexual orientation, so that's why I differentiate. I'd love to hear other points of view though, so I can continue to hone my word choices.

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 05:00:22 UTC
oh and me being a word nerd, I occasionally will say "hebetudinous" where others might say "retarded", as a more severe alternative to "stupid" or "idiotic". It's not quite a synonym, but it's so much fun to say!

Reply

banjololo November 15 2009, 05:01:47 UTC
Although "hebetudinous" really is much closer to a synonym to "retarded" than "stupid" or "idiotic" are...

Reply


Leave a comment

Up