Leave a comment

Comments 24

hip_hopper February 14 2008, 00:57:27 UTC
... please please please include "Post hoc ergo propter hoc." That is my favorite logical fallacy. Or maybe "Cum hoc ergo propter hoc" because that one has "cum" in it and, yes, I am immature.

Reply

weekafternext February 14 2008, 09:28:11 UTC
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Reply

strucktwelve February 15 2008, 00:52:42 UTC
Aw, sweet, faulty causal assumption! Totally putting that in somewhere. .

Prudence is eyerolling but SECRETLY LAUGHING ON THE INSIDE.

Reply


bramblesgaveway February 19 2008, 06:07:40 UTC
*monopolizes*

Reply

strucktwelve February 19 2008, 06:08:07 UTC
I LIKE IT WHEN YOU'RE ALL OVER MY STORYLINES. OH BABY.

Reply

bramblesgaveway February 19 2008, 06:09:30 UTC
ALL OVER THAT LIKE BUTTER ON TOAST, BABY.

Reply

strucktwelve February 19 2008, 06:10:26 UTC
mommy, she touched me in my storylines. :[

Reply


tinsoldiered February 19 2008, 16:53:32 UTC
CHARLIE SAYS HE DESERVES ONE FOR EVEN ENTERTAINING THE IDEA OF FISHNETS, THX.

Reply

tinsoldiered February 19 2008, 16:54:15 UTC
also, quentin says holla, lab partner.

Reply

cygnard February 19 2008, 21:59:51 UTC
CHRIS SAYS HE DESERVES ONE FOR WEARING THEM.

Reply

strucktwelve February 19 2008, 22:47:49 UTC
GET ON THE BANDWAGON MOFO.

Reply


quietchamber February 19 2008, 21:25:12 UTC
HAHAHA WHERE THE FUCK IS MINE. BITCH.

Reply

strucktwelve February 19 2008, 22:48:20 UTC
HMM NO IHU.

except not, jk, i'll make one. WHAT KIND OF FALLACY SHOULD LEO BE

Reply

quietchamber February 19 2008, 22:55:35 UTC
THE SEXY KIND

Reply

strucktwelve February 19 2008, 23:00:56 UTC
IF-BY-WHISKEY

... NOW I JUST NEED DEETS, YO.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up