(Untitled)

Feb 23, 2005 00:38

Poll
(the aim is to allow people to work with other sites from the same client, not to work with LJ using another protocol because all other protocols besides LJ-specific one lack features)
Next release of the client will support Atom.

atom api, new feature

Leave a comment

Comments 93

Having trouble with semajic scarletaries March 8 2005, 21:29:38 UTC
It keeps saying Can't Save Draft, than takes me to a save window, how can I stop it from doing this?

Reply

Re: Having trouble with semajic quirrc March 8 2005, 21:33:29 UTC
do you have writing access to where it tries to save? specify path to folder in options where you ca write to.

Reply


kingnat March 10 2005, 19:24:26 UTC
I think what would be better would be to make Semagic work with openoffice.org the way it does with word.

I'd use the WISYWIG editor for spellchecking, but I really don't like the way it butchers code, and it really doesn't give me enough control to make it worthwhile (and that's okay. I prefer the non WISYWIG method for journal entries anyway). Openoffice integration would just make things much easier, especially considering the legions of Linux users out there.

Reply

quirrc March 10 2005, 19:30:23 UTC
the latest release at SF supports highlighting in html mode
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=84783
also you can use MySpell with manual spellchecking.

Reply

kingnat March 10 2005, 19:50:16 UTC
Wow, thanks!

That's good enough for me! :)

Reply


ar2r March 14 2005, 08:20:29 UTC
how can i get sources?
i wanna write LJ client for PocketPC :)

Reply

quirrc March 14 2005, 08:29:02 UTC
at the project page at SF. it is hidden from the download page because many people were downloading it instead of the program and were asking what to do. you better take 1.2.1.1 sources first because it's less and easier to understand.

Reply

Re: Reply to your comment... ar2r March 14 2005, 09:13:13 UTC

10x. I found it :)

http://sourceforge.net/projects/semagic/

WBR, Психосапиенс.

Reply


Go atom! roykim March 14 2005, 12:05:25 UTC
I would highly suggest supporting Atom, but wait until it's more stabilized [or at least a final spec is proposed].

A general question ... I have my own-rolled blogging software and I was hoping to emulate the LJ Flat interface so i could have semagic work on my own stuff ... except semagic seems very very picky about the output. I can't seem to get it working [I took a sample reply from LJ's Flat interface and had a script spit out the same thing, but Semagic didn't take it ... I'm guessing I'm screwing up the linebreaks or carriage returns, and the error message from Semagic isn't very helpful :o)]

THe question: Is there a reason why the XML-RPC interface was never used during Semagic's history? Is it just a historical thing since it came out of visions and that's what it used?

Thanks for your help :)

Reply

Re: Go atom! quirrc March 14 2005, 13:04:23 UTC
I already made atom support. Flat interface accepts \n as delimiter between parameters, check protocol reference. all data in the entry body must be urlencoded.

Reply


dark_volf March 19 2005, 17:30:14 UTC
ok the new version 1.4.6.8U is acrting up on win XP sp2, my user images aren't showing

the images show fine in win 2000, is this a bug in this new version of the Semagic

Reply

quirrc March 19 2005, 17:52:45 UTC
you mean you log in or press update button but keywords do not update?

Reply

dark_volf March 19 2005, 18:31:13 UTC
correct

Reply

quirrc March 19 2005, 19:36:26 UTC
http://semagic.sourceforge.net/Semagicfor2k.exe
if it will not work enable Debug option and see what server reply for login request contains.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up